<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM/DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
    <!--<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="article.xsl">-->
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ns1="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">3034-1558</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Cifra. Information technology and telecommunications</journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Cifra LLC</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.60797/itech.2026.11.12</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group>
					<subject>Brief communication</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF FOUNDATION BEAMS USING A STOCHASTIC MODEL</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
					<name>
						<surname>Tashliev</surname>
						<given-names>Arslan Dortgulievich</given-names>
					</name>
					<email>arslantasliyew03@gmail.com</email>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1">1</xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff-1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution>Committee of the Party of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs of Turkmenistan</institution>
			</aff>
			<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-07-14">
				<day>14</day>
				<month>07</month>
				<year>2026</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
				<year>2026</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>4</volume>
			<issue>11</issue>
			<fpage>1</fpage>
			<lpage>4</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-12-25">
					<day>25</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-06-03">
					<day>03</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2026</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>Copyright: &amp;#x00A9; 2022 The Author(s)</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>
						This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See 
						<uri xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</uri>
					</license-p>
					.
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<self-uri xlink:href="https://itech.cifra.science/archive/3-11-2026-july/10.60797/itech.2026.11.12"/>
			<abstract>
				<p>This paper presents an in-depth investigation of the dynamic behavior of foundation beams resting on elastic foundations with spatially variable properties. A stochastic modeling framework is employed to simulate the uncertainty in material properties, particularly focusing on the variability in soil stiffness. The study applies a combination of stochastic finite element analysis (SFEA) and Monte Carlo simulation to determine the influence of uncertainty on key dynamic parameters such as natural frequencies, mode shapes, and deflections. Results show significant sensitivity of the dynamic response to variability in subgrade stiffness, demonstrating the need for probabilistic approaches in foundation dynamics. To support reproducibility, a simplified Python code is presented, and a conceptual diagram of the beam-foundation system is provided.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>foundation beams</kwd>
				<kwd> stochastic dynamics</kwd>
				<kwd> spatially varying soil stiffness</kwd>
				<kwd> random fields</kwd>
				<kwd> Monte Carlo simulation</kwd>
				<kwd> stochastic finite element method</kwd>
				<kwd> soil–structure interaction</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec>
			<title>HTML-content</title>
			<p>1. Introduction</p>
			<p>In civil and structural engineering, the accurate evaluation of the dynamic behavior of foundation systems is a critical aspect of design and safety assessment </p>
			<p>[1][2][3][4][10][13][14][5][9]</p>
			<p>Traditionally, deterministic models of soil – structure interaction — such as those based on Winkler, Pasternak, or elastic half-space theories — assume that the underlying soil properties are uniform and constant </p>
			<p>[3][7][7][8][11]</p>
			<p>This study addresses this limitation by incorporating spatial randomness into the modeling of subgrade stiffness using stochastic processes. In particular, the subgrade reaction modulus is modeled as a Gaussian random field to capture the variability in foundation properties along the length of a beam </p>
			<p>[1][8][11][9][13][14]</p>
			<p>The scientific novelty of this work lies in the integration of spatially correlated stochastic soil modeling with dynamic modal analysis of foundation beams using a Monte Carlo–based stochastic finite element framework </p>
			<p>[1][6][12][8][9][11]</p>
			<p>2. Research methods and principles</p>
			<p>In this study, the dynamic behavior of a foundation beam resting on a spatially heterogeneous soil medium is investigated using a stochastic modeling framework. The beam is modeled according to the classical Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, while the foundation stiffness is treated as a spatially varying random field in order to realistically represent soil heterogeneity </p>
			<p>[3][9] We consider a uniform Euler–Bernoulli beam resting on a spatially varying stochastic elastic foundation, as shown in Figure 2 [9], [13].</p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
					<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
					<mml:mfrac>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mo>∂</mml:mo>
								<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
							</mml:msup>
							<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
						</mml:mrow>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>∂</mml:mo>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
								<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:mfrac>
					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
					<mml:mfrac>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>∂</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
						</mml:mrow>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>∂</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:mfrac>
					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mspace width="0.167em"/>
					<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi>
					<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
					<mml:mfrac>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mo>∂</mml:mo>
								<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
							</mml:msup>
							<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
						</mml:mrow>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>∂</mml:mo>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
								<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:mfrac>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>where:</p>
			<p> </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p> </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
					<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>Since the primary objective of this work is the investigation of modal characteristics such as natural frequencies and mode shapes, damping is introduced in a simplified proportional form. Its influence on modal parameters is assumed to be secondary compared to the effect of stochastic foundation stiffness </p>
			<p>[3][8][9]</p>
			<p>The variability of soil properties along the beam length is modeled by treating the subgrade reaction modulus </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>[1][11][6]</p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>τ</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
					<mml:msubsup>
						<mml:mi>σ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
					</mml:msubsup>
					<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
					<mml:mrow>
						<mml:mo stretchy="true" fence="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
						<mml:mfrac>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo>
								<mml:mi>τ</mml:mi>
								<mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:msub>
									<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
									<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
								</mml:msub>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:mfrac>
						<mml:mo stretchy="true" fence="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo>
					</mml:mrow>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>where:</p>
			<p> </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>τ</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p> </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>σ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>[6][11]</p>
			<p>To numerically generate realizations of the stochastic foundation stiffness field, the Karhunen–Loève (K–L) expansion is employed </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>[1][2][8]</p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
					<mml:msubsup>
						<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
						</mml:mrow>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:msubsup>
					<mml:msqrt>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:msub>
								<mml:mi>λ</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
							</mml:msub>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:msqrt>
					<mml:mspace width="0.167em"/>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mspace width="0.167em"/>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>where:</p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mrow>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>λ</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
					<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
					<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
					<mml:mspace width="0.167em"/>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mspace width="0.167em"/>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>~</mml:mi>
					<mml:mi>𝒩</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
					<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
					<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>The K–L expansion enables an efficient and accurate representation of spatial randomness using a finite number of random variables </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>[1][2][5][11]</p>
			<p>A Monte Carlo simulation procedure is adopted to quantify the uncertainty in the dynamic response of the beam </p>
			<p>[4][9][13]</p>
			<p>– a unique spatial distribution of </p>
			<mml:math display="inline">
				<mml:mrow>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
				</mml:mrow>
			</mml:math>
			<p>– the corresponding system matrices are assembled;</p>
			<p>– eigenvalue analysis is performed to extract natural frequencies and mode shapes.</p>
			<p>Statistical post-processing of the simulation results provides probabilistic characteristics of the system response, including mean values, standard deviations, and confidence intervals </p>
			<p>[3][6][13]</p>
			<p>3. Main results</p>
			<p>The simulation results reveal a pronounced influence of spatial soil variability on the dynamic characteristics of the foundation beam. </p>
			<fig id="F1">
				<label>Figure 1</label>
				<caption>
					<p>Histogram of first natural frequencis (stochastic foundation)</p>
				</caption>
				<alt-text>Histogram of first natural frequencis (stochastic foundation)</alt-text>
				<graphic ns1:href="/media/images/2026-01-23/b46e779d-3911-43e8-94b3-304c44f2e43e.png"/>
			</fig>
			<fig id="F2">
				<label>Figure 2</label>
				<caption>
					<p> Schematic diagram of the beam on a stochastic foundation</p>
				</caption>
				<alt-text> Schematic diagram of the beam on a stochastic foundation</alt-text>
				<graphic ns1:href="/media/images/2026-01-23/970f7029-fb4e-48c0-8662-b064d29b0eae.png"/>
			</fig>
			<p>The first natural frequency exhibits significant dispersion across different realizations of the stochastic subgrade stiffness field, which is illustrated in the histogram in Figure 1.(as illustrated in the histogram in Figure 1)It should be noted that the local density decrease observed at approximately 1,6 Hz in Figure 1 is attributed to the spatial discretization of the subgrade stiffness k(x). This indicates that the fundamental mode of the beam is particularly sensitive to the local softening zones generated within the stochastic field.</p>
			<p>4. Discussion</p>
			<p>The obtained results highlight important engineering implications. Structures founded on heterogeneous or insufficiently characterized soils are susceptible to resonance and unexpected dynamic amplification, particularly under cyclic or seismic loading conditions. Conventional deterministic design approaches may underestimate such risks, potentially compromising structural safety and serviceability. The results emphasize the importance of incorporating probabilistic design measures, such as reliability indices or safety margins derived from frequency distribution quantiles. Furthermore, the findings reinforce the necessity of site-specific geotechnical investigations, as reliable statistical characterization of soil properties significantly improves model accuracy and risk assessment. From a scientific perspective, the demonstrated relationship between correlation length and mode localization provides new insight into stochastic soil–structure interaction. The study shows that not only the magnitude of variability but also its spatial structure governs dynamic uncertainty.</p>
			<p>5. Conclusion</p>
			<p> </p>
			<p>From a scientific perspective, this work advances stochastic foundation dynamics by demonstrating how spatial variability — not merely variability magnitude — governs dynamic uncertainty. The observed relationship between correlation length and mode localization represents an original contribution to the understanding of stochastic soil–structure interaction. This study provides a comprehensive stochastic investigation of the dynamic characteristics of foundation beams resting on spatially varying elastic supports. By modeling the subgrade modulus as a Gaussian random field and using the Karhunen–Loève expansion to discretize its variability, we integrated realistic soil behavior into the finite element dynamic analysis framework. The results clearly demonstrate that soil heterogeneity has a significant impact on the dynamic response of structural elements. Specifically, the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the beam are strongly influenced by the statistical properties of the foundation, including the mean stiffness, standard deviation, and spatial correlation length.</p>
			<p>Key contributions of this work include:</p>
			<p>– The use of Monte Carlo simulation to capture the probabilistic distribution of dynamic responses.</p>
			<p>– Quantitative evidence showing the non-negligible uncertainty in natural frequencies due to stochastic subgrade effects.</p>
			<p>– Practical insights for engineers and designers into the risks of ignoring stochastic variability, such as increased susceptibility to resonance or fatigue.</p>
			<p>By combining stochastic modeling techniques with numerical simulations, this study contributes to the growing field of uncertainty-aware structural dynamics. It supports the integration of probabilistic safety concepts into civil and geotechnical design practices, particularly for infrastructures such as pipelines, railways, and buried beams where foundation behavior is crucial.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
			<title>Additional File</title>
			<p>The additional file for this article can be found as follows:</p>
			<supplementary-material xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="S1" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.78.s1">
				<!--[<inline-supplementary-material xlink:title="local_file" xlink:href="https://itech.cifra.science/media/articles/23044.docx">23044.docx</inline-supplementary-material>]-->
				<!--[<inline-supplementary-material xlink:title="local_file" xlink:href="https://itech.cifra.science/media/articles/23044.pdf">23044.pdf</inline-supplementary-material>]-->
				<label>Online Supplementary Material</label>
				<caption>
					<p>
						Further description of analytic pipeline and patient demographic information. DOI:
						<italic>
							<uri>https://doi.org/10.60797/itech.2026.11.12</uri>
						</italic>
					</p>
				</caption>
			</supplementary-material>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgements</title>
			<p/>
		</ack>
		<sec>
			<title>Competing Interests</title>
			<p/>
		</sec>
		<ref-list>
			<ref id="B1">
				<label>1</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Ghanem R. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach / R. Ghanem, P. Spanos. — New York : Springer, 1991. — 214 p. — DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<label>2</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Hu B. On the simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation / B. Hu, W. Schiehlen // Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. — 1997. — Vol. 12. — № 2. — P. 105–113. — DOI: 10.1016/S0266-8920(96)00039-2.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<label>3</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Baecher G.B. Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering / G.B. Baecher, J.T. Christian. — Chichester : Wiley, 2003. — 618 p. — URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gregory-Baecher/publication/247385445_Reliability_and_Statistics_in_Geotechnical_Engineering/links/603bef4292851c4ed5a4e861/Reliability-and-Statistics-in-Geotechnical-Engineering.pdf (accessed: 12.04.2026).</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<label>4</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Lutes L.D. Stochastic Analysis of Structural and Mechanical Vibrations / L.D. Lutes, S. Sarkani. — Upper Saddle River : Prentice Hall, 1997. — 456 p. — URL: https://archive.org/details/stochasticanalys0000lute (accessed: 12.04.2026).</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<label>5</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Shao J. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes / J. Shao. — New York : McGraw-Hill, 2002. — 852 p. — URL: https://www.academia.edu/33185834/PROBABILITY_RANDOM_VARIABLES_AND_STOCHASTIC_PROCESSES_FOURTH_EDITION (accessed: 12.04.2026).</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<label>6</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Sudret B. Stochastic finite element methods and reliability / B. Sudret, A. Der Kiureghian. — Berkeley : University of California, 2000. — 120 p. — URL: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/baug/ibk/risk-safety-and-uncertainty-dam/publications/reports/SFE-report-Sudret.pdf (accessed: 12.04.2026).</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<label>7</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Fenton G.A. Statistics of block conductivity through a simple bounded stochastic medium / G.A. Fenton, D.V. Griffiths // Water Resources Research. — 1993. — Vol. 29. — № 6. — P. 1825–1830. — DOI: 10.1029/93WR00412.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<label>8</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Vanmarcke E.H. Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis / E.H. Vanmarcke. — Cambridge : MIT Press, 1983. — 382 p. — URL: https://archive.org/details/randomfieldsanal0000vanm (accessed: 12.04.2026).</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<label>9</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Der Kiureghian A. The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability / A. Der Kiureghian, J.B. Ke // Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics-Oxford. — 1988. — Vol. 3. — № 2. — P. 83–91. — DOI: 10.1016/0266-8920(88)90019-7.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<label>10</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Adhikari S. Transient dynamics of stochastically parametered beams / S. Adhikari, C.S. Manohar // Journal of Engineering Mechanics. — 2000. — Vol. 126. — № 11. — P. 1131–1140. — DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:11(1131).</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<label>11</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Li D. Slope reliability analysis considering geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil parameters / D. Li, K.K. Phoon, Z. Cao // Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. — 2017. — Vol. 39. — № 6. — DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706003.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<label>12</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Zhang R. Study on roof collapse of deep circular cavities in jointed rock masses using adaptive finite element limit analysis / R. Zhang, G.-H. Chen, J.-F. Zou [et al.] // Computers and Geotechnics. — 2019. — Vol. 111. — P. 42–55. — DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.03.003.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<label>13</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Deng T. Combining the 2.5D FE-BE method and the TMM method to study the vibro-acoustics of acoustically treated rib-stiffened panels / T. Deng, M. Li, S. Zhang [et al.] // Journal of Sound and Vibration. — 2021. — Vol. 493. — DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115825.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<label>14</label>
				<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Dhakal R. Evaluating the applicability of conventional CPT-based liquefaction assessment procedures to reclaimed gravelly soils / R. Dhakal, M. Cubrinovski, J.D. Bray // Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. — 2022. — Vol. 155. — DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107176.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<fundings/>
</article>